Catman: Category Management Association Releases Benchmark ROI Survey
octubre 13, 2016
First-‐Ever Look Reveals Need for Standard Metrics to Value CatMan Function
The Category Management Association has released a first-‐of-‐its-‐kind survey of the methods and practices used by manufacturing companies to measure the return-‐on-‐investment (ROI) of their category management functions. While results indicate broad acknowledgment of the growing importance and analytical sophistication of category management, survey participants across all channels say they need standard metrics and a consistent way to measure ROI.
The ROI survey asked North American category management professionals to report on the prevalence of ROI efforts in their companies, and identify parameters used to measure and demonstrate ROI to senior management. Sixty-‐six CPG companies participated in a confidential online survey, with each company represented only once in the dataset. Of those, 27% said they currently measure ROI [link to slide 14]. The inaugural study targeted only manufacturers; the CMA also plans to survey retailers. The study will be repeated annually for both retailers and manufacturers.
LEA TAMBIÉN: Catman: ¿cómo seducir a los clientes?
“The survey was a good initial assessment and we know that CPG companies are measuring ROI,” said CMA Founding Director Donna Frazier. “This type of benchmarking is what people really want. But more importantly, they told us there is a huge need for standard metrics and the ‘How-‐to-‐Measure CatMan ROI’ Guidelines. Particularly in this economy, category management is the key to a total company strategy that keeps CPG manufacturers and retailers in business. CatMan professionals want to know what their peers are doing and what is working successfully. They want to share insights so they know where they fit in terms of reporting structures and value to their companies.”
Survey Reveals Different Factors Used to Demonstrate CatMan ROI
The survey includes profiles of the responding companies and their CatMan functions, specific questions about their current ROI practices, viewpoints from participants on ROI measurement, and areas for improvement. Among the findings:
- While a third of the companies do measure ROI, nearly 70% of those indicated they do not use a particular formula.
- Most companies report that resources are deployed to 4 or fewer “significant” categories.
- While half of the companies set a dollar goal for Sales, 18% do not set any quantitative goal for their CatMan initiative.
- Retailer metrics are factored into the cost-‐benefit evaluation.
- In 85% of the cases where manufacturers understand the customer’s profitability, CatMan ROI aligns with the profitability of the customer.
One common point of view is that Category Management has become an intrinsic part of CPG profitability. “Our company has already moved beyond the ROI question,” said one survey respondent. “Category management is a cost of doing business and the capability helps us win with customers.”
Respondents said there are many areas that need improvement, particularly the lack of formal methodology and metrics. “[We] need better integration with the sales team and formal scorecard implementation,” remarked a respondent. “Currently, evaluation metrics are limited to revenue and profit at total customer level.” Another participant said, “Without a straightforward way to calculate ROI, the most difficult part is to justify investments such as analytical packages that have no tangible or direct benefit.” Others cited a need to be able to objectively quantify the impact of category management on sales.
Innovative ROI Share Group Identifies Challenges, Gathers Input for Best Practices
Besides using traditional survey methodology, the CMA utilized its innovative peer “share group” forum to gather information and suggestions from participants about ROI approaches. “Share groups are an ideal way to study industry methods and processes and we will continue to use them to develop the ROI how-‐to,” said Frazier. “The ROI survey crosses all categories. Our share groups work by introducing industry professionals to their peers, and facilitate cross-‐category peer introductions to share insights. Peers are not asked to share any proprietary information, just approaches.”
One ROI share group meeting was led by Manny Zayas, Director of Category Management North America for PepsiCo. In his presentation at the Annual Category Management Association Conference, Zayas said, “The ROI Share Group identified common challenges such as maintaining objectivity, positioning ROI to do more than merely defend the worth of the department, and choosing from among the many factors that drive the perception of value.” He continued, “The group also communicated some potential best practices and basic needs for ROI measurement, including a consistent formula or approach, annual updates of the benchmark, alignment with retailer metrics, and reporting results independently of sales and finance departments.”
Para más información, visita: Catman Global
Editado por Luis Eduardo Herrera, Ingeniero Bioquímico con un MBA del ITESM. Consultor activo en áreas de planificación de negocios, Shopper Marketing, Gestión de Categorías y Marketing Digital. Expositor y ponente en México, Estados Unidos y América Latina. En la actualidad es Vicepresidente Ejecutivo para América Latina en la Category Management Association; consultor socio de Shopper Marketing-WSI y el presidente de la junta para Latinoamérica de la CMA. Cuenta con amplia experiencia en el sector del comercio minorista. Artículo cortesía de Catman Global
Las redes sociales siguen aumentando su influencia en los consumidores. En este sentido, Facebook se
Los smartphones influirán en el 55% de las ventas del retail en 2020 Las ventas en
MyBloo es el nombre del servicio presentado por Beabloo, la empresa de marketing digital omnicanal
eBay ha puesto en marcha un proyecto con la creación de un asistente de compras
Catman: How To Win At Category Management
octubre 19, 2016
Many of you are likely familiar with the old investment warning, “past performance is not